home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: viking.mpr.ca!laurinol
- From: laurinol@mprgate.mpr.ca (Kai Laurinolli)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland or MS???
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 96 17:47:52 GMT
- Organization: Digital Courier International, Inc.
- Message-ID: <4jejc0$1mk@viking.mpr.ca>
- References: <00001a81+0000aac7@msn.com> <4hjmig$q7u@news1.usa.pipeline.com> <4i6jg7$l26@hoder.gre.ac.uk> <3159E343.551C@nando.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: laurinol.mpr.ca
- X-Newsreader: News Xpress Version 1.0 Beta #4
-
- In article <3159E343.551C@nando.net>, Caius Martius <caius@nando.net> wrote:
- >GL493@gre.ac.uk wrote:
- >>
- >> >>If you want to use MFC's, the only way is Visual C++ (or Symantec C++!).
- >> >
- >> >This is about to change with BC++5.0.
- >> >
- >>
- >> All I can say is Hoorah!! - Yep I'm a Borland Fan!
- >
- >The Borland C++ Development Suite definitely supports MFC...
- >
- >-Caius
-
- Yeah, but it only supports MFC 3.2 and 4.0 so if you are want to develop
- 16-bit MFC apps forget it. Borland neglected to mention this to us.
-
- - Kai
-